Lab 1: Map critique

1.    Example of a well-designed map. (Copy and paste jpg in this document)

2.    One paragraph critique of your well-designed map—critique must be supported with 2-3 map design principles.

This is an example of an impressive looking map due to several well thought our design considerations.  First, the map’s title clearly explains what the map is presenting to the audience.  Second, the map has clear, detailed labelling throughout as demonstrated by the wildlife management area game zones being not only numbered but color coded as well.  Finally, this example of a well-designed map presents interesting data in an aesthetically pleasing layout.  The use of space is managed effectively and fully so that there aren’t any large gaps to distract the viewer.  One other observation that I think makes this an exemplary effort is the use of vital mapping elements, such as, a north arrow, legend, who made it, when, and where to get further information.

3.    Example of a poorly-designed map. (Copy and paste jpg in this document)

4.    One paragraph critique of your poorly-designed map—critique must be supported with 2-3 map design principles.

The map above is easily one of the worst examples I saw in the collection on eDesktop.  I chose this map because it is lacking in the exact qualities where my previous map was strong.  There is no title to give the audience an idea what we are looking at.  Do these points reflect shipwrecks, oil rigs, places of interest?  The lack of labelling is equally frustrating as a viewer.  I’m left to wonder what these points could be and why they are important to the map maker.  There are so many mysterious points that it looks overly cluttered.  Aside from the lack of a title and labels, the designer should have utilized better symbology.  The thick white border just makes this mess even messier.